The Email Delivrability blog of Get to the Inbox by ISIPP SuretyMail

Watch Your Text to Image Ratio

One of the things that spam filters look at is the text:image ratio of your email. Did you know that?

If you’ve ever gotten one of those spam messages which has a big old nasty image, and little text, or perhaps even one of those spam messages where the text is embedded in an image, you may understand the reason for this. It’s because spammers likes to send messages with images and little text – because of course the spam filters are analyzing their text.

Let us help you get to the inbox! Contact us here!

So, if you send email which has a high image-to-text ratio, the spam filters are likely to think that your email is spam, and send it to the junk folder. They may even come to the conclusion that you are a spammer, and block you.

Of course, the answer is not to add a bunch of random text to go with that image.

Because spammers do that, too.

It’s also important to remember that if you include an image file as an attachment, many spam filters and virus checkers will junk your email because it has an attachment.

On the other hand, if you simply include a link to a graphic file hosted elsewhere, that will increase your text:html ratio, which can also cause problems, but we’ll talk about that another day.

The messge here is to be aware of your text:image ratio – don’t go sending a bunch of images with relatively little text. And if you think about it, for most commercial email – such as an email marketing campaign – there should be more text than images anyways.

Unfortunately there is no hard and set rule as to what a safe ratio is, but a good rule of thumb is that you want at least one paragraph of text for every image.

In the end, the bottom line is that you should err on the side of being judicious with your use of images in email.

Follow Us! Follow us!

    Next: » All About Email Delivery Monitoring

« Previously: Address Book Importing is Just Not OK


This article originally written on May 11, 2016, and is as relevant now as when it was first written.